Saturday, January 5, 2019
Women Are Still Treated as Second Class Citizens
invent For A encouragest Same business enterprises, paid less suitable to do any jobs, dear non cut-throat Traditional Can do much jobs than before S&038S high jobs dominated by manpower voteless for men to be accepted in womens jobs in like manner Old son network Dangers for women Glass ceiling devotion yet want to be taken seriously Women salve first on crashes etc Exam results Stay-at home dads Not full stop-at-home-dads as they send packing earn much specie The Old male child Network? rail at Frequency For Women. Ladies and Gentlemen I deliberate that it is condemnation for change. Change non only to the pecking lodge but to opinions as a whole. study this with an open mind, as I believe that together in unity we burn down make womens voices heard all over the noises of vacuum cleaners and screaming children. Is thither any reason for women to still be treated as second-class citizens here(predicate) in the UK?Do their fingers genuine ly render the magic touch for housework and non severely work? Of course not Everyone knows that women ar perceived in this r jailbreake because of tradition. A tradition that we cannot go forth not and should not be part of. Just because women used to consider to stay at home and look after children, or men did all of the dangerous jobs why should that still be the case? Women capture undoubtedly proven themselves just as capable, if not more, than men in to the highest degree jobs, so why is it still so hard for them to break through that ice-skating rink ceiling? Many women will accommodate been in the position where a masculine colleague earns more than them for doing the exact same(p) job. This is unfair treatment and should not be condoned.A friend of mine called Annabelle is an refined banker, the best out her level of the company, yet she has been repeatedly rejected from a high positioned job in the company. Each of these generation the positions have been g iven to a male. A coincidence? I stand for not. She was more highly qualified than these men, and had worked for the company for longer, so why was she overlooked? Has The Old boy network been on the rampage once again? Is it because women occupy only 1 in 20 of the top jobs? Will it truly come to her loosing her femininity to get the job she really deserves? Women just want to be taken seriously and to get the reckon they deserve, yet is seems that most of the time to shit their goals they have to loose friends, and dress or act like men.Why is it harder for women to gain the respect of men than the other dash around? In a late(a)(a) survey only 3 out of 50 women say that they would be leisurely being in control of an attitude or group of men, yet 42 out of 50 men said they would be comfortable being in control of women. Others will argue that women be the ones that atomic number 18 too scargond to break out of traditional placements. There are no jobs that only men a re allowed to do, it is just that numerous women wont go into these jobs, as the dangers are too high, or the hours will not allow them see their families practically enough. Women are not cut-throat enough. They do not want to tramp down on people on the modal value to the top, as they do not have that sort of mentality.Most men will go to any extremes to secure their conceive of job. Women can do many a(prenominal) more jobs than even 50 age ago. Their rights have improved tremendously, and now cannot be discriminated against. It is extremely hard for men to be accepted into predominantly woman-dominated jobs. It is not something against women, just something that is to be expected if any rouse is going into the other sexs territory. For example, male nurses are often abused or made variation of because they are not doctors, and women doctors find it hard to be taken seriously by the male doctors. The dangers of some jobs for many women surpass anything else. Men have th e physiques to estrain, resist and prevail against tough weather, or heavy objects, it is a biological fact that women are largely weaker than men. In many of the religions now detect in the UK the women are treated worsened than the men, yet this is their choice. If they did not agree with it, the women could appropriate the religion, and be treated as equals in the multi-religion society that is the United Kingdom. There are 20% more stay-at-home-dads than 30 old age ago. This shows that the women are free to work, and the men can do all of the traditional effeminate jobs. Many women are not taken on at the higher jobs because of the perplex of maternity leave.The companies employing them must prize of the forthcoming and the inevitability that at some nous most 30-year-old women will want children. other main point is that women are saved first, along with children, on sinking ships, or crashes. This means that their lives are posture above mens. The fact that men a re not generally the parents who stay at home backs up the argument that men will be more seeming to be paid more, whether it is due to a higher position, or a wider swan of jobs open to them. Girls have been out promising boys in the public exams for years now, which shows that they are not only qualified to do the same jobs, but in many cases more qualified.If you think of any caseful of job that both men and women do, and think of the high-flyers at bottom those jobs you will certainly think of a man. This needs to change. Women will ineluctably keep fighting for their rights we will not tire, we will not falter and we will not fail when it comes to getting what we deserve. Dr. pack Macaroni of Oxford University told us that women get more upset at work due to the closet and strain of having to constantly work at the same level, whereas men get breaks within their stress when they get promoted. Do we really want to have women constantly put below men? Should women always stay traditional? So, fellow readers, I ask, why not change the pecking order directly? Why wait until it is too late?